Elementary School Literacy Facilities Index: Analysis of Availability and Its Implications for the School Literacy Movement in Cianjur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62208/jelr.3.3.p.110-118Keywords:
Elementary School, Literacy Facilities, Literacy Facility Index, School Literacy MovementAbstract
This study aims to analyze the literacy facilities index in elementary schools in Cianjur and its implications for the implementation of the School Literacy Movement (SLM). The study employed a quantitative approach with a descriptive survey method involving 91 schools. Data were collected through a questionnaire covering four components: physical literacy facilities, school literacy media, reading resources, and digital literacy facilities, and were analyzed using mean scores and index calculations. The results show that the overall literacy facilities index is 3.15 (fair category). School literacy media (3.54) and reading resources (3.45) are categorized as good, digital literacy facilities (3.04) are fair, while physical literacy facilities (2.67) are the lowest. The limited availability of physical literacy facilities, particularly libraries and laboratories, restricts students’ access to learning resources and constrains the development of sustainable literacy environments, thereby hindering the effective implementation of the School Literacy Movement. Therefore, policies should prioritize the equitable provision and optimal utilization of physical literacy facilities to strengthen its implementation. These findings highlight the importance of addressing facility disparities in supporting school literacy programs.
Downloads
References
BPS. (2025). Statistik Daerah Kabupaten Cianjur 2025.
Clark, C., & Teravainen, A. (2017). National Literacy Trust Research Report Book Ownership and Reading Outcomes. 1116260, 1–10.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In SAGE Publications, Inc. (5th ed.). SAGE publications.
Dijk, J. van. (2020). The Digital Divide. Polity Press.
Faizah, D. U., Sufyadi, S., Anggraini, L., Waluyo, Dewayani, S., Muldian, W., & Roosaria, D. R. (2016). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/40/
Fatmawati, N. (2025). Urgensi Literasi Digital dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Abad 21 di Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Literatur dan Strategi Implementasi. Social, Humanities, and Education Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v8i3.107405
Gee, J. P. (2015). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722511
Krashen, S. D. (2004). The Power of Reading: Insights from the Research (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Loh, C. E., Sundaray, S., Merga, M., & Gao, J. (2021). Principals and Teachers’ Perspectives of Their School Libraries and Implications for School Library Policy. Journal of Library Administration, 61(5), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2021.1924532
Merga, M. K. (2020). School Librarians as Literacy Educators Within a Complex Role. Journal of Library Administration, 60(8), 889–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1820278
Merga, M. K., & Ferguson, C. (2021). School Librarians Supporting Students’ Reading for Pleasure: A Job Description Analysis. Australian Journal of Education, 65(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944121991275
Min, J., & Seo, Y. S. (2024). The Use of Digital Devices for Schoolwork at Home and Reading Achievement: Multilevel Analyses of The PIRLS 2016 U.S. Results. International Journal of Educational Research, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102418
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mufliva, R., & Permana, J. (2024). Teknologi Digital dalam Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar sebagai Isu Prioritas dalam Upaya Membangun Masyarakat Masa Depan. Kalam Cendekia Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v12i1.83127
Murti, A. D., Hernani, & Fatimah, S. S. (2024). Analysis of Indonesian Students Scientific Literacy Ability in Chemistry Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning Research, 2(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.62208/jelr.2.1.p.43-51
Ng, W. (2015). New Digital Technology in Education: Conceptualizing Professional Learning for Educators. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05822-1
OECD. (2021). 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Opria, Ștefana, & Momanu, M. (2023). Systematic Literature Review on Digital Citizenship Education for Primary School Students. Journal of Educational Sciences, 47(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.35923/JES.2023.1.06
Selwyn, N. (2016). Debates, Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Street, B. (2003). What’s ‘New’ in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.52214/cice.v5i2.11369
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
UNESCO. (2024). Literacy for Empowerment and Transformation: Report of the UN Secretary-General.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A Comparative Analysis of International Frameworks for 21st Century Competences: Implications for National Curriculum Policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Wijayanti, A., Dwiningrum, S. I. A., & Saptono, B. (2024). Digital Literacy in Elementary Schools Post COVID-19: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(12), 96–112.
Yousofi, R., Golzar, J., & Yacoub, O. (2025). Digital Divides and Bridges: Equity Implications of EdTech in ESL Education. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1590828
Youssef, A. Ben, Dahmani, M., & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide. Information, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tita Hasanah, Abdul Talib Bin Mohamed Hashim (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
